Matti Kajaste
Senior advisor, Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC)
There is such an abundance of international co-operation, benchmarking and experience-sharing going on between European quality assurance agencies that it is sometimes easy to forget the differences that persist. A quality assurance agency and the type of evaluation method it utilises are, in my opinion, very much a product of the respective country's system of higher education. The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC), for example, has chosen a very enhancement-led quality audit model because of the need to respect university autonomy, a deeply rooted characteristic of the culture of higher education in Finland. Not every type of evaluation method is compatible with every culture of higher education however.